 Beyond, Alongkorn Lauwatthana’s exhibition in Bangkok does not so much invite the viewer in as assume you will step into its world and keep up. The paintings stretch across the gallery walls like a continuous visual argument; coherent, immersive, and entirely uninterested in modesty. Lauwatthana has long worked with intensity, but here the scale and density feel amplified, as though he has decided that if a painting can be a universe, it may as well act like one. From afar, each multi-panel work organises itself into a single entity. Compressed movement, calibrated saturation, a sense of an internal system humming along. Step closer, however, and the surfaces atomise into dozens of micro-scenes. Figures appear mid-gesture, suspended between narrative possibilities. They don’t pose; they hover. The works behave like stories that have openings but refuse resolutions, leaving viewers to navigate a landscape where the plot has politely opted out. A central tension animates the show: the push and pull between flatness and complexity. Lauwatthana borrows the compositional logic of Thai mural painting (layered silhouettes, frontality, spatial compression) but he deploys these conventions with a contemporary sensibility that feels more analytical than nostalgic. The patterns, for instance, don’t sit on the surface as embellishment; they function like structural forces. They corral the figures, interrupt them, sometimes smother them entirely. The effect is less decorative than infrastructural, as though pattern itself were the architectural material of this universe. Colour plays an equally decisive role. Lauwatthana’s palette has always occupied the more assertive end of the spectrum, but here he leans into a chromatic vocabulary that borders on argumentative. Electric greens, lacquer reds, saffron yellows, bruised violets; the combinations are unconventional but internally logical, like a dialect you don’t speak but immediately recognize the rhythm of. The palette refuses to behave politely, which is precisely what gives the work its vitality. The colours insist on being read, and they reward the effort. The figures themselves are stylised to the point of becoming glyphs. Angular and ritualised, they resemble characters who have wandered out of traditional mural cycles only to find themselves negotiating a contemporary terrain built from visual density. They are not so much protagonists as participants—agents within a larger system of pattern, gesture, and coded movement. Their interactions feel choreographed in the way ecosystems are choreographed: not by intention, but by underlying rules. This choreography extends to the viewer’s experience. Moving through the exhibition feels like tracing the logic of an overarticulated visual sentence. Gestures recur, motifs echo across panels, colours reappear with variations that feel both deliberate and instinctive. The compositions are maximal, but not indulgently so; they are maximal the way a well-constructed argument is maximal, because anything less would be incomplete. The exhibition layout heightens this sense of continuity. The paintings run the length of the gallery in a way that encourages longitudinal reading. The polished floor casts mirrored reflections that double the visual field, creating an inadvertent but effective dialogue between the works and their echoes. Standing in the center of the room, one becomes acutely aware of being inside a proposition rather than in front of a set of paintings. What distinguishes Lauwatthana’s approach is the intelligence with which he navigates tradition. Many artists reference heritage; fewer manage to treat it as both material and constraint, something to be expanded rather than merely cited. Lauwatthana’s relationship to Thai muralism is neither deferential nor iconoclastic. He treats it as a system of visual thinking, a set of compositional tools that can be reconfigured to articulate contemporary sensibilities. The result is work that feels rooted yet forward-facing, grounded yet speculative. By the time the viewer reaches the end of the exhibition, a certain clarity emerges: Lauwatthana is engaged in world-building rather than scene-painting. His interest lies in constructing environments governed by their own internal logic. Worlds in which pattern dictates movement, colour generates atmosphere, and figures navigate their roles with a mix of ritual precision and quiet uncertainty. His universe is dense, exacting, and unexpectedly generous; it allows the viewer to oscillate between macro and micro without losing coherence. The exhibition ultimately confirms Lauwatthana as an artist invested not only in visual richness but in conceptual architecture. His work possesses the rare ability to be simultaneously overwhelming and exact; expansive in scope yet meticulous in execution. One leaves the gallery not with the sense of having deciphered a complete system, but with the distinct impression that the system is still elaborating itself just out of sight. And that, perhaps, is the work’s most compelling gesture: it suggests that the conversation it begins is one it fully expects you to continue. Beyond, Solo art exhibition by Alongkorn Lauwatthana, 3-29 October 2025. (22 October 2025) 
0 Comments
Bui Hai Son’s sculptural installation at the Ho Chi Minh City Fine Arts Museum occupies the gallery with the kind of quiet authority usually reserved for objects that predate the building itself. At first glance, the work resembles a trio of elongated, seed-like vessels; part pod, part hull, part archaeological whisper. They rest and hover in the room as though caught mid-migration, suspended between states of arrival and departure. Son has always had an interest in transitional objects, but here he takes that notion almost literally, presenting forms that seem designed for travel even as they remain resolutely still. The materials are deceptively humble: wood, metal studs, and a textured surface treatment that suggests both natural growth and human intervention. Yet the objects resist any single reading. Their ribbed exteriors recall the armor of ancient watercraft, while their tapering ends gesture toward botanical origins. They occupy a space somewhere between vessel and seed, artifact and organism. This ambiguity is not incidental; it is the engine of the piece. Son has crafted forms that behave like ideas in the process of becoming tangible. One of the installation’s most striking qualities is the way it leverages scale to unsettle familiar categories. The sculptural “pods” are far too large to be seeds, yet far too organic to be boats. Their studded, almost carapace-like surfaces evoke both the protective logic of marine architecture and the biological rhythms of growth, decay, and renewal. The viewer is left oscillating between interpretations, which is precisely where Son’s work thrives. He is less interested in definitive objects than in objects that activate questions; questions about origin, function, and the tenuous dividing lines between natural and constructed worlds. The installation’s placement within the museum heightens this effect. The classical molding, decorative tilework, and colonial architectural details of the space act as a counterpoint to Son’s earthy futurism. The contrast is subtle but generative: the room frames the sculptures as though they were specimens retrieved from an era that had not yet learned how to categorize them. Their angled positions (one leaning upward, another braced against the floor) evoke the dynamics of movement without depicting it outright. They feel as if they arrived moments ago, or are preparing to depart once the viewer turns away. Son’s practice often deals with migration and memory, though not in the overtly narrative way that contemporary sculpture sometimes prefers. Instead, he approaches these themes through material intelligence and structural metaphor. The hollow, tapering forms suggest bodies built for passage, yet their studded surfaces complicate any sense of fluid travel. These objects would not glide; they would endure. They read less like vehicles and more like vessels of accumulated time, carrying histories that remain deliberately opaque. Humour (the quiet, intelligent sort) emerges in the work’s stubborn refusal to disclose its purpose. The sculptures hover between usefulness and symbolism with a kind of deliberate coyness, as if they are aware that viewers will attempt to decode them and have chosen, in advance, not to cooperate fully. Their aerodynamic profiles imply directionality; their static presence contradicts it. The result is a sly visual paradox: an object built for motion that insists on staying exactly where it is. The installation also invites a more intimate reading. The studded surfaces, arranged in rhythmic patterns, evoke both armor and vulnerability. They could be read as protective spikes or as the traces of historical repair, the kind of patchwork left on old boats after years of maintenance. The interior, glimpsed at the ruptured edge of one form, suggests layered strata, as though the object has lived multiple lives and now presents only its most recent iteration. Son’s work often contains this sense of cyclical renewal: objects that appear old but are, in fact, newly old; forms that feel ancient but are firmly contemporary in their abstraction. The museum setting, with its restrained lighting and polished stone floor, amplifies the installation’s atmospheric quiet. The reflections on the floor mirror the sculptures, creating shadow-doubles that flatten and elongate them further. These reflections function almost like annotations, secondary readings offered by the room itself. The interplay between the sculptures and their doubled forms introduces another layer of ambiguity, as though the works are being translated into another visual language while the viewer watches. What ultimately distinguishes Bui Hai Son’s installation is its conceptual precision wrapped in material understatement. These sculptures do not announce their interpretations; they accumulate them. They operate on the logic of speculation, inviting the viewer to consider what an object might be if freed from the obligation to be one thing at a time. They gesture toward memory without illustrating it, toward movement without performing it, toward nature without mimicking it. The result is a form of sculptural thinking that feels both grounded and quietly speculative. By the time one exits the gallery, the objects linger, not as literal vessels, but as propositions. Son offers them not as answers but as frameworks for imagining how materials remember, how forms migrate, and how objects can be rooted and in motion at once. In a museum filled with works eager to tell their stories, these sculptures do something more interesting: they give the impression of having stories, while leaving the viewer to determine what those might be.   GALLERY NOTES
Historic Sculptural “Heads” (bronze or bronze-like busts) Form & Modeling
Form & Line
Weight vs. Lightness
The juxtaposition sets up a dialogue between eras: the solidity of historical representation vs. contemporary fragmentation. The busts anchor the space with a sense of lineage, while the wire forms reinterpret the body as a fluid, open system. Together, they offer a meditation on how human presence is represented - from enduring physical likeness to dynamic, ephemeral structures shaped by time, movement, and perception.  GALLERY NOTES (V&A, London)
Overall Impression
 GALLERY NOTES : National Art Gallery, Singapore
Overall Presence
Kahlo’s Expression & Presence
human skin → animal fur → raw wood. Emotional & Psychological Tone
Self-Portrait with Monkey (1945) shows Kahlo presenting herself not alone but in relationship — to her animal companion, to Mexican identity, and to the natural world whose wounds mirror her own. The fractured wood suggests bodily fragility; the monkey’s touch suggests healing. Kahlo’s steady gaze asserts control, defiance, and truth. Nestled between the sturdier pillars of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights—Education (Article 26) and Social Order (Article 28)—lies Article 27: the right to participate in cultural life and enjoy the arts. It can appear, at first glance, like an administrative afterthought, as if the UN slipped in “the arts” the way one might slip a scented candle onto a list of emergency supplies. It raises the question: is art a human need, or simply a desirable accessory to one’s actual needs?
History suggests the former, though many would be surprised to see art listed adjacent to food, shelter, and political stability. Yet the arts have long lived in this paradoxical space: seen as frivolous until removed, at which point society promptly collapses into dystopia. This tension sits at the heart of Article 27. To understand its significance, it is helpful (and admittedly amusing) to turn to economist John Maynard Keynes, a man known for rescuing governments from economic ruin by day and spending his evenings with the Bloomsbury Group discussing beauty, ethics, and the occasional scandal. Keynes believed the arts were not the garnish on civilisation but its destination. In 1930 he predicted a future in which technological progress would reduce the working week to 15 hours, leaving humanity with its “real, permanent problem”: how to use our leisure “to live wisely and agreeably and well.” For Keynes, the answer was the arts—an elevated state of consciousness that philosopher G.E. Moore called “the enjoyment of beautiful objects.”¹ That future has not, regrettably, arrived. The 35-hour global working average stands as mute evidence. But Keynes’ point remains: art is not merely decorative; it is aspirational. The tension grows sharper when art functions not as an end point but as a catalyst for social change. While Keynes imagined art as the outcome of a just society, artists such as Robert Motherwell used art to challenge injustice directly. Motherwell’s Elegies to the Spanish Republic - a series of more than 200 monumental, abstract black-and-white compositions - grew from the trauma of the Spanish Civil War into universal meditations on suffering and resilience.² Picasso’s Guernica, of course, stands as another towering reminder that art often performs the emotional labour that politics fails to. Ai Weiwei extends this lineage, merging activism with aesthetic force. His works, from breaking a Han dynasty urn to documenting state violence, illustrate how art questions authority in ways that are both disarmingly simple and deeply inconvenient for those in power. His insistence on free expression (despite arrests, surveillance, and the occasional emergency surgery) suggests he considers art not a luxury but a necessity.³ If dystopian literature is any guide, authoritarian regimes share this view. In Brave New World and Equilibrium, art is censored or destroyed precisely because it awakens emotion - an unhelpful side effect when the aim is total social control. Maslow’s hierarchy places self-actualisation at the summit of human need: the drive to become one’s fullest self. Art, whether encountered or created, is a primary route to that summit. To remove it is not merely to limit pleasure but to constrict human possibility. Article 27, then, is not an indulgence. It is a recognition that survival alone is insufficient, that to be fully human we must also think, feel, imagine and participate. As Motherwell said, “Art is much less important than life, but what a poor life without it.” (Adapted from lecture delivered at NLCS Singapore, 7 Dec 2023) LINK References
 There is a particular species of art-history enthusiast, the kind who swears they will behave sensibly in museums and then dissolves into scholarly hysteria at the sight of a 17th-century foot. I am that species. Paris, with its triumvirate of the Musée d’Orsay, Centre Pompidou and the Louvre, provided the ideal ecosystem for this entirely predictable intellectual unravelling.
At the d’Orsay, I began respectably enough. Degas’ Little Dancer, encased like a small, formidable saint, lifted her chin with that uncanny mixture of adolescent determination and mild condescension. I assumed a suitably serious stance, hands clasped, brow concentrated, while internally whispering, My goodness, that’s her. Then came Manet’s Olympia, who does not simply hang on a wall but enters into a staring contest with your entire sense of control. Confronting her is not interpretation; it is an encounter, and one she reliably wins. By the time I reached the Pompidou, any trace of cool detachment had evaporated. Before Warhol’s repeated visions of Liz Taylor, I found myself contemplating the existential exhaustion of celebrity while also thinking, This is extremely glamorous. Pollock’s frenetic webs of paint invited the classic art-historical lean: arms folded, head tilted, posture reading both deeply engaged and slightly unwell. Finally, at the Louvre, I made a final effort at restraint. It lasted forty seconds, ending the moment I stood in front of Caravaggio’s Flagellation of Christ. The chiaroscuro was so intense it felt geological, and there I was, photographing individual toes like an unhinged connoisseur of baroque anatomy. One cannot claim scholarly dignity while zooming in on feet, but I attempted it nonetheless. Somewhere in the slow shuffle toward the Mona Lisa, I realised the true revelation of Paris was not the canon itself, but the rediscovery of the inner child who once worshipped it, earnest, overexcited, and entirely unmoved by my adult façade.  GALLERY NOTES: (how the human head is rendered, idealised, fractured, and reimagined)
The Head as Symbol of Power, Character, and Identity
Classical Terracotta Bust
The Head in Dialogue with History
Hyper-real ‘preserved’ blood head (Marc Quin)
The Head as Military and Political Persona
Paintings
Sculpted heads = corporeal (relating to the body) presences The Fragmented, Distorted, or Abstracted Head
Across the grouping, there is an implicit progression:
How learning beyond the classroom doesn’t have to mean learning outside of the classroom
When hearing the word ‘enrichment’ in a school context, most picture students taking part in sport, the arts and the myriad other extracurricular activities that are on offer in the best institutions. Enrichment is often perceived as something that happens outside of the classroom. However, this perception can have two damaging effects on school life. First, it can relegate sport and the arts to mere co-curricular activities that are there to give students an escape from their studies. They become add-ons, rather than academic disciplines in their own right, which they absolutely should be. Second, it can lead to a culture in which academic learning is confined to the classroom, and to timetabled lessons, which it absolutely should not be. It is important to consider how schools enrich their students academically, providing the opportunity and encouragement to explore their interests beyond the classroom. This means creating provisions that are beyond anything found in the taught curriculum, not simply extending what is taught in the classroom. The benefits of such experiences are vital for students’ authentic discovery of their own academic passions. More sophisticated and independent learning opportunities What does academic enrichment look like in schools? When done well, the provisions aren’t necessarily extra-curricular; they are part of the school day. Lectures, seminars, accredited online courses and public speaking opportunities create a mature learning experience more often found in universities. If students leave a session with more questions than they arrived with, the level of challenge was probably pitched at the perfect level to inspire curiosity. Intellectual curiosity, which comes so naturally to younger children, often fades as they get older and focus their minds on textbooks and exams. Academic enrichment allows us to reignite it, and foster independent thought in a way that rote learning never could. Learning beyond the curriculum By offering students the option to study content beyond the curriculum, academic interests are discovered and encouraged. This is excellent preparation for university course selection and application preparation. Sometimes this learning can be applied to real world situations through service or action research, but very often the topic is selected simply because it fascinates the specialist delivering the session. Teachers demonstrating their own authentic subject passion is highly influential on students’ learning and engagement. Low stakes lead to high returns Learning experiences without exams, assessments or even written outcomes, remove anxiety and encourage more risk-taking in the classroom. Students find their voices in a safe academic setting, increasing esteem which is in turn transferred to their curriculum-based learning. Increased proficiency in collaboration, articulate conversation and public speaking are clearly evident in those participating in academic enrichment activities. Improved attainment In studying beyond the taught curriculum, students obtain a greater comprehension of the context of what is being learnt. Through the gained communication skills, students have the tools to more actively participate in their learning. Ultimately, academic enrichment fosters an authentic love of learning which goes hand in hand with greater academic success. At NLCS (Singapore) our academic enrichment programme provides a vast range of scholarly experiences, clubs, and societies for all students. Through both teacher and student-led programs, students turn areas of interest into genuine areas of expertise. Published : ANZA Singapore, 18 January 2023.  There is something uniquely humbling about entering the National Gallery Singapore on a bright, humid morning and immediately tripping over (conceptually, not physically) an Antony Gormley. One minute you’re admiring the geometry of colonial architecture; the next, you are confronted with a bronze body star-fished across the floor as though it has simply had enough of existence. Classic Gormley: part sculpture, part existential mirror.
Further in, I stumbled upon a hulking concrete cube punctured with oddly biological openings — a work that looks, depending on one’s mood, like a philosophical bunker or the world’s most threatening birdhouse. Either way, it demands contemplation. Or submission. Hard to tell. What makes seeing his work here so enthralling is how effortlessly it commandeers space. In a building full of symmetrical columns, polished stone and gracious lightwells, Gormley’s forms interrupt the aesthetic order with quiet authority. They ask the big questions (about embodiment, presence, and the troublesome weight of being human) but do so without raising their voice. By the time I’d completed my unofficial Gormley tour, I felt oddly grounded, as if the sculptures had performed a kind of unsolicited mindfulness intervention. In a frenetic city, his figures offer an anchor: calm, contemplative, and reassuringly solid, even when lying flat on their face. |